MogScore vs UMAX

Both are face rating apps. The approach is completely different. Here's an honest comparison.

Metrics analyzed
17 individual metrics
Single overall score
Privacy
100% on-device (WebAssembly)
Photo uploaded to servers
Scoring method
Bell curve per metric + weighted avg
Neural network (black box)
Consistency
Same photo = same score always
Score varies between attempts
Archetype system
15 archetypes (8M, 7F) with celeb comps
Basic categories
Metric breakdown
Each metric scored 1-10 with explanation
Limited or none
Free tier
Full analysis + archetype + all 17 metrics
Limited scans, then paywall
Paid guide
$4.99 one-time, 8 sections, personalized
Subscription model ($9.99+/mo)
Scientific backing
30+ PubMed references per guide
Generic tips
Gender-specific
Different weights for M/F
Same model for all
Radar chart
Visual breakdown of all metrics
Not available
Technology
MediaPipe 468 landmarks (WASM)
Server-side ML model
MogScore
UMAX

Why People Switch to MogScore

Privacy. UMAX requires uploading your photo to their servers. MogScore processes everything in your browser — your photo never leaves your device. This is architecturally enforced, not just a policy.

Depth. Getting a single “7.2/10” doesn't tell you anything actionable. MogScore scores 17 individual metrics so you know exactly where your strengths and weaknesses are.

Consistency. UMAX gives different scores for the same photo. MogScore is deterministic — same photo, same score, every single time. You can track real changes over time.

Cost. UMAX uses a subscription model. MogScore's scan is completely free, and the personalized guide is a one-time $4.99 payment with no recurring charges.

What UMAX Does Better

Brand recognition. UMAX has been around longer and has a larger user base. They've invested heavily in marketing and social media presence.

Simplicity. If you just want a quick number without deep analysis, UMAX's simpler approach may be sufficient.